Former President Goodluck Jonathan on his Lecture in United States of America, took a swipe on the former President, Olusegun Obasanjo over his third term bid, saying that if not for a vibrant parliament in place, he would have had his way.
Jonathan spoke in the United States at an event titled: “Presidential elections and democratic consolidation in Africa: Case studies on Nigeria and Tanzania” and co-hosted by National Democratic Institute (NDI) and the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS).
According to Jonathan, the strong resistance of the Nigerian National Assembly actually frustrated the third term bid of former President Olusegun Obasanjo.
“Of course, I was a governor at that time under the People’s Democratic Party (PDP), the same party as Obasanjo, but due to strong resistance from the National Assembly, the third term bid failed.”
According to Jonathan, Africa needs strong parliaments to checkmate sit-tight presidents who influence parliaments to consider amendment to the constitution that would extend their stay in office.
“Changing constitutions to eliminate term limits in order to favour incumbents is inconsistent with democratic principles and reduces confidence in democratic institutions.”
While addressing the issue of weak African institutions, Jonathan observed that African democracies are becoming stronger, adding the situation would greatly improve in the next decade.
He further noted that although some leaders in Africa are still able to manipulate their way to elongate their tenure, the people are increasingly raising their awareness and African parliaments are becoming stronger to be able to resist such tendencies in future. He made reference to Burkina Faso, where he noted that although the parliament approved an extra term for the former president, the people resisted that, forcing the president and speaker of the parliament to go on exile. Also in Senegal, Jonathan, noted that the former President thinking he would win another term increased the tenure of his office to seven from five years. But the opposition candidate won the election and returned the tenure to five years, believing that seven years was too long for one term.
On the issue of security contracts for which his former Security Adviser, Sambo Dasuki, is currently facing charges, it is believed that the Jonathan administration spent a sizable amount of money equipping all the security and intelligence outfits in the country over his five-year period in the presidency.
But Jonathan stated that his administration never awarded a single contract that was worth $2 billion, stressing that the economy couldn’t have supported such huge amount of money to be awarded at once. “At no time did I award a single contract of $2 billion for procurement of weapons.”
Jonathan stated that like most governments around the world, there might have been issues of corruption during his time as President. He however maintained that the story was being unnecessarily embellished, adding that there are ongoing investigations and court processes that would establish the truth.
For instance, he frowned at the allegation that some officials in his administration were stealing one million barrels of crude oil a day at a time when Nigeria’s production peaked at 2.25 million barrels.
“To claim that half of that was being stolen on a daily basis doesn’t add up, otherwise the government wouldn’t have functioned at all to even be able to pay salaries,” Jonathan said.
Sunonline.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Add a comment